Winnsboro Town council showed their support to Sen. Creighton Coleman and Rep. Boyd Brown Tuesday night by voting unanimously to sign a resolution in support of the recently passed legislation that will change the responsibility and make-up of the Fairfield County school board.
The resolution stated that the Winnsboro Town council “wholeheartedly supports” H.4431 and H.4432, amending the S.C. Act regarding the responsibilities and the make-up of the Fairfield County school board by forming a five person, legislatively-appointed, finance committee to oversee the school district’s finances and adding two legislatively-appointed, at-large members to the current seven, single-district elected school board members.
Both Mayor Roger Gaddy and council member Bill Haslett recommended the council sign the resolution.
“From my standpoint, I know that the Town of Winnsboro does not pay any taxes that go into the management and operations of the schools,” Gaddy said. “I think we are all aware that we’ve had problems with the management of our schools for a number of years. And my personal feeling is I will support the resolution also and the two House Bills.”
Last week, the Town of Ridgeway decided not to sign the same resolution, saying it would not be right to sign it without first knowing how the citizens of Ridgeway felt about the two bills.
With both pieces of legislation passing the House and Senate earlier this month, the next step for the two House Bills is approval by the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. Since South Carolina is still covered under the 1965 Voting Rights Act, any law that pertains to the election process must pass the Justice Department.
Also Tuesday night, the council held the final reading of an ordinance amending the current tree ordinance. The first part of the ordinance, section 3-1053: terms of office, will stagger the terms of appointed tree board members. Two members will serve for two years, while two other members will have a one year term. The board’s remaining three members will serve a three year term.
The second part of the ordinance being revised is section 3-1068: arborists’ license and bond. According to the amendment, it will be unlawful for a business to prune, treat or remove street or park trees within the town without first applying for and procuring a business license. Before the license is issued, the applicant must show proof of liability and property damage insurance. They must also provide proof of Worker’s Compensation Insurance.
In other business:
• Resident Dick Driscoll expressed concern about the council’s recent decision to extend lobbyist Kyle Michel’s contract. Driscoll said Michel’s salary should be commission-based only, instead of a paid salary. Michel, a lawyer from Columbia, was hired last year by the county and town to secure grant money from the federal government. His contract ended in February, but town council voted earlier this month to extend his contract for another nine months.
• The council voted to transfer its municipal elections to Fairfield County Voter Registration and Election Office. The county election office was already responsible for setting up the election machines for each municipal election and certifying the election results. The transfer will eliminate the Town of Winnsboro election committee.
Because government rests on trust, we expect our public officials – appointed as well as elected – to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest. Without trust, democratic government is replaced either by the rule of force or a cynical indifference on the part of its citizens. Without trust, there is no genuine consent of the governed, the foundation of democracy.
We'd love to hear from you! The NAACP welcomes your comments.
NAACP National Headquarters
Mailing Address: 4805 Mt. Hope Drive, Baltimore MD 21215
Toll Free: (877) NAACP-98
Local: (410)
SENATOR LINDSAY GRAHAM
290 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20510
202-224-5972
SENATOR JIM DEMINT
340 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20510
202-224-6121
SENATOR JOHN SPRATT (5TH DISTRICT)
1401 LONGWORTH BLDG.
WASHINGTON, S.C. 20515
202-225-5501
CONGRESSMAN JAMES CLYBURN (6TH DISTRICT)
2135 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BLDG.
WASHINGTON. S. C. 20515
202-225-3316
THOSE WHOSE LAST NAMES BEGIN WITH...
A THROUGH G WRITE GRAHAM
H THROUGH N WRITE DEMINT
O THROUGH U WRIRE SPRATT
V THROUGH Z WRITE CLYBURN
WRITE OR CALL
1. AN INTEGRAL PART (ACTING SUPER.,I THINK) OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT.) SINCE SHE OBVIOUSLY CONTRIBUTED TO THE SITUATION, SHE HAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
2. HASLETT- CONFLICT AS COUSIN OF COLEMAN
3. DANNY MILLER - TERMINATED BY THE CURRENT SCHOOL BOARD - OBVIOUS CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
DID THAT GROUP COMPLY WITH VICKER'REQUEST TO PAY OVER $5,000 TO THAT VERY ATTRACTIVE ACCESS HOUSE THE DISTRICT WANTED?
MY LORD, PLEASE GIVE SOME OF THESE PEOPLE A BRAIN AND KEEP THEM OFF THE TRAIN.
DENTON, WHAT YA GONNA DO? SOUNDS LIKE A RETRACTION IS IN ORDER. WE WILL BE WATCHING FOR IT.
SEE THE FOLLOWING CHART. APPARENTLY THE PERCENTAGES WERE INACCURATE. THE LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION DID NOT ADD (1) AND (2) TOGTHER TO GET THE CORRECT PERCENTAGE. THE CHART IS FROM THE SOUTH CAROLINA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
The primary reason for the two bills filed by the Legislative Delegation was stated to be that 70% of budgeted funds did not go to instruction. Furthermore, the Legislative Delegation made the statement that the bills would “sunset” (be void) when the Board reached the 70% allocation. Hence, the percentage was a major factor in the decision made by the Delegation.
The following calculations are from the S.C House of Representatives:
Calculation of 70% to Instruction
Flexibility Proviso as amended and passed by the House.
FY 2007-2008 data
Dist ID District Instruction (1) Instructional Support (2) Non Instructional Pupil Services (3) Principals (4) Total % - Amendment Passed by the House
1804 Dorchester 04 53.07% 14.15% 10.16% 9.36% 86.74%
1901 Edgefield 56.89% 11.38% 8.35% 6.20% 82.82%
2001 Fairfield 52.50% 16.52% 8.38% 4.63% 82.03%
Based upon this, the above indicates that budgeted Instruction 1 is at 52.50% and Instruction 2 is at 16.52%. That totals up to 69.02%. That is only .08 the targeted goal. If I remember correctly, Coleman and Brown were using the 53.07%. That difference is hardly worth the money being spent. Also, I do believe that they announced the 53.07% to the taxpayers of Fairfield County and to the Legislature of the State of South Carolina. In fact, when I look at the chart in its entirety, it is not so out-of-line from the rest of the counties. If Fairfield has the legislature structures Fairfield’s instructional percentages, I presume they will apply the same requirements to all counties. That would only be fair and equitable. Fairfield is no different from many of the other counties.
And the Town voted on something they did not thoroughly investigate? Where is fiduciary obligation nowadays?
Ridgeway was wise; yet do you even see that in this "newspaper?" More information for Bush.
Would you not think Marsha Bonds has a conflict of interest? It would certainly appear to be so. She was part of the management team during many of those years. I guess that one is for the Justice Department.
How can the Legislative Delegation continue to give figures which are not accurate to the public and the governing bodies?
Why don't pretend you got the scoop on this one. Tell them you figured this out all by yourself without their help. You merely perpetuated the misinformtion.
You can also ask the Town about the grants that they received that they would have gotten anyway without a $100,000 lobbyist? Those "water and sewer" grants are very interesting.
Due to a lack of accurate information, there are blogs growing up on the internet and proliferating like fire ants.
I HAVE A SURPRISE FOR YOU. I BELIEVE THAT A MAJOR MISTAKE HAS BEEN MADE. IF I TRUSTED YOU, I WOULD TELL YOU. HOWEVER, YOUR ALLEGIANCES ARE ALREADY FIXATED WITHOUT YOUR KNOWING THE FACTS. NOT GOOD FOR A JOURNALIST. YOU WILL FIND OUT IN GOOD TIME. IF I GET AROUND TO IT, I MAY LET YOU KNOW ABOUT IT TOMORROW. THEN AGAIN, I MAY NOT!
"ARE YOU HUMAN? SORRY, WE HAVE TO BE SURE."